[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[mgp-users 01171] Re: Sam's Improvements; my MGP macro processor
- To: mgp-users@mew.org
- Subject: [mgp-users 01171] Re: Sam's Improvements; my MGP macro processor
- From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 00:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivered-to: mailing list mgp-users@mew.org
- In-reply-to: <>
- Mailing-list: contact mgp-users-help@mew.org; run by ezmlm
- References: <> <> <>
From: Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
Subject: [mgp-users 01167] Re: Sam's Improvements; my MGP macro processor
Date: 28 May 2003 09:24:50 -0400
Message-ID: <>
> > > The main feature of XML is that its syntax is unambiguous.
> >
> > It's interesting how the type system trade-off between expressiveness
> > and verification seems to follow through to file formats. :) I think
> > that I would rather lose the complete unambiguity in exchange for the
> > ease of being able to hit tab instead of typing '<point level="n">'
> > into my presentation many times.
>
> You _are_ a Perl aficionado, aren't you?
I believe this kind of thing is like religious and we cannot say which one
is better. So, I personally believe at the moment that the golden goal is
to support both ways.
> > [1]: <http://axpoint.axkit.org/>
Thanks for useful information. I will take a look.
--
Yoshifumi Nishida
nishida@csl.sony.co.jp