[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(mgp-users 00583) Re: side-by-side positioning
- To: mgp-users@mew.org
- Subject: (mgp-users 00583) Re: side-by-side positioning
- From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:23:49 +0900
- In-reply-to: <>
- Posted: Thu, 24 May 2001 21:24:58 +0900
- References: <> <> <>
- Reply-to: mgp-users@mew.org
From: Christopher Drexler <drexler@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: (mgp-users 00579) Re: side-by-side positioning
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:22:53 +0900
Message-ID: <>
>> What I'm thinking of right now is to go one step further and to define some
>> 'columns' which act as an improved 'mark' and keep a 'column width' and
>> the text alignment in addition. You can switch between the defined columns
>> and the linewidth and alignements are restored an new text is added at the
>> postion where you left the column.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think about something like this.
Hmm.. I hesitate to tell about functions that I haven't tried to
implment yet...
I believe that main advantage of current syntax is that it preserves
WYSWYG style to some extent. So I prefer like this,
-----------
%xoffset 10 5 20 5 30
AAA<TAB>BBB<TAB>CCC
AAA<TAB>BBB<TAB>CCC
%noxoffset
DDD<TAB><TAB>EEE
------------
this syntax will be displayed like this:
----------------------------
10% 5% 20% width 5% 30% width
<------>AAA <----------------->BBB <--------------------------->CCC
AAA BBB CCC
DDD EEE
----------------------------
--
Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp>
Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc.