[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(mgp-users 00580) Re: side-by-side positioning
- To: mgp-users@mew.org
- Subject: (mgp-users 00580) Re: side-by-side positioning
- From: "Rouben Rostamian" <rostamian@umbc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:45:00 +0900
- In-reply-to: Christopher Drexler's message of May 23, 3:22pm
- Posted: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:41:31 -0400
- Reply-to: mgp-users@mew.org
The proposed side-by-side columns will be a very valuable addition to mgp.
I wish I had it for a presentation two weeks ago.
I have a suggestion about the syntax of such side-by-side columns.
What we are doing, in effect, is creating a table. So why not call
a table a table?
Something like this:
%begin table 20 40 60
%column
item11
item21
item31
item41
%column
item12
item22
item32
item42
%column
item13
item23
item33
item43
%end table
This describes a table of 3 columns and 4 rows, the columns being
positioned at 20%, 40%, and 60% from the left margin.
One should also be able to describe a table in the row-order, as in:
%begin table 20 40 60
%row
item11
item12
item13
%row
item21
item22
item23
%row
item31
item32
item33
%end table
This describes a 3x3 table where the entries are prescribed in the row-order.
The argument "20 40 60" specifies the column spacing, as before.
--
Rouben Rostamian <rostamian@umbc.edu>