[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[mgp-users 01298] Re: Differences between 09a and 10a
- To: phil@NetBSD.org
- Subject: [mgp-users 01298] Re: Differences between 09a and 10a
- From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 15:26:01 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: mgp-users@mew.org
- Delivered-to: mailing list mgp-users@mew.org
- In-reply-to: <>
- Mailing-list: contact mgp-users-help@mew.org; run by ezmlm
- References: <>
I think it's related to xft2 support in 1.10a.
If you suppress the xft2 function by adding -x xft, perhaps you will get
the same result as 1.09a.
Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi Nishida
nishida@csl.sony.co.jp
From: Phil Nelson <phil@NetBSD.org>
Subject: [mgp-users 01297] Differences between 09a and 10a
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:09:48 -0800
Message-ID: <>
> Hi,
>
> I just subscribed to this list. I've been using 1.09a for a while and then
> recently upgraded to 1.10a. This has all been on NetBSD (i386/1.6 branch)
>
> I was using a real nice feature in 9a where a tab on a line that didn't
> start with a tab caused the text to be lined up nicely. So I could easily do
> tabular functions. With 10a, those tab characters are not rendered as a
> small rectangle and it does not line up the text at tab stops. Here are my
> questions.
>
> a) Was this an intended feature of 9a or just something I noticed that
> worked?
>
> b) If this was a know feature of 9a, how can I get it back in 10a? If it
> wasn't a feature (just a bug :), then I'd like it to be a feature in the
> future. How can this be accomplished?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --Phil
>
>
>
>